Yeah, that's how I roll.
If this were a Twitter 140 character review it would be: Not nearly as good as the first but a solid sequel.
Origin movies just always seem to work out better, and Favreau and company really sold me on the hero as scientist/inventor aspect of Tony Stark in the first "Iron Man" movie. Iron Man is a superhero that just never really clicked with me. Probably the same 'eat the rich' mentality towards billionaire heroes that makes me really dislike Batman as well (That control freak). My friends and I used to make fun of our our one friend who was an Iron Man fan during shellhead's West Coast Avengers, find-him-at-the-bottom-of-a-bottle, days.
That armor, though, was always pretty cool. I always liked the silver and red design, the rounded shoulder pieces, and triangle chest piece (didn't even realize that he had different shapes until this movie). It wasn't until recently, the Civil War crossover series in the comics in fact, that I really started to like Tony Stark's character as well; a man trying his best to do good and having it epically fall apart on him. He was flawed despite the suave and smooth exterior. Which is why Robert Downey Jr. is such a great choice for the role: he's just as charming yet troubled and vulnerable.
If the first movie was about a sheltered rich-boy putting on a suit of armor to protect himself from the frightening adult world of owning a legacy of violence and war, the second is about a man now defeated and deteriorating within his metal shell. Tony Stark becomes the armor, the smile and wave that hides the fact that inside, the technology is eating away at him.
The idea of legacy in the film is interesting too, because we get to see father & son reconnect, the passing on the wisdom of your elders that takes you from your present, brings you back to the beginning, and helps create a perspective that propels you from your current dilemma. The Stark Expo held at the site of the old World's Fair in Flushing, Queens is a great way to mix the old "anything is possible with science" idealism with the new "science as science-fiction," as that entire area is being gutted and reovated, changed for the 21st Century. (Oh, they blow the hell out of it by the end of the movie, so a great cinematic goodbye to a New York Landmark.)
The structure was pretty well laid out for an action movie, the first action scene on the racetrack is a phenomenal set-piece. Everything about that scene was amazing. From the suitcase armor, Happy Hogan driving on the racetrack, a supervillain attack, right down to Tony Stark gliding through the setup for the scene. It was bad ass.
Though it does really slow it down with the Mickey Rourke/Ivan Vanko scenes, considering his character is slightly underused.
The middle of the movie lingers for awhile and the down moments, the dramatic scenes, the character development and interaction, just doesn't have the punch that every scene from the first had. Every scene in the first movie was entertaining, even the subtle moments with Tony & Pepper. Though I must admit that the Tony/Pepper dynamic is just as good as in the first film--the dialogue between Downey Jr. & Paltrow feels real, and flows well as they try and talk right over each other.
In fact, Paltrow's performance, her reactions to the insanity around her, the disapproving looks swapped between Pepper and Tony, were really the highlight of the film for me. I can't help but smirk as Paltrow and Downey Jr. say more with a glance than they do when delivering dialogue.
Sam Rockwell drops in as industrialist Justin Hammer, doing his best smarmy used car salesman, but there isn't enough room in the film to allow him to utilize his full range. Same for Mickey Rourke, Scarlett Johansson & Sam Jackson. They're pretty cardboard backdrops.
Nick Fury felt like Sam Jackson pretending to be Nick Fury, and not very hard. Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow was fairly subdued through the whole film, she has one scene at the start that is fun, and her action scene was another amazing set-piece, in fact, it had many people talking afterwards (Reilly: 'I want to draw a scene like that!'). However, the first time we see her in the costume is in a donut shop, very matter-of-fact, and it just sort of kills what could have been a much cooler reveal of the character.
This leaves us with Don Cheadle as Jim Rhodes. Cheadle replaces Terrance Howard who played Rhodes in the first film, but Don Cheadle is a much better actor. That said, Cheadle's approach to the character left the Tony/Rhodey friendship feeling really flat. They start as reluctant enemies in act 1, and then escalate to physical enemies (though this should have been in a non-suit situation that developed into a suit fight) which gives us our act 2 fight scene.
It makes for a good demonstration as to what it means to be in a suit of powered armor where you can get hit, thrown, smashed through a floor, and it's not a big deal. You get an idea of the weight of the suits, and the power. The audience didn't really seem to get behind this scene, mostly for the drunk-at-a-party Iron Man lead-in that seemed to invoke Dark Peter Parker from Spider-Man 3 (which I enjoyed but most people hated).
The science breakthrough that Tony Stark makes just before act 3 is an interesting metaphor; creating a new element, giving birth, creating rather than destroying. The process as to how he figured it out was heavy handed though, and really felt like they were either trying too hard to be clever or were just being lazy. I liked it at the time, but thinking back on it, it seems pretty dumb finding the blueprint to a new atom layout, which is the same as the World's Fair layout.
Which all leads to the superwarfare ending. Massive military drones, Iron Man versus War Machine, the suit as protection vs the suit as a weapon. Lots of stuff is blown up, shot to pieces, smashed and destroyed. This is a comic book action scene. Unfortunately you see the highlights in the trailer, so there's not all that much added to the scenes to make it that amazing, except when they get down and dirty with the drones in the little botanical garden and beat the crap out of everything while pulling off some awesome video game fighting finishing moves.
The final showdown with Whiplash/Ivan was underwhelming. It was definitely one major step towards pulling off epic superhero battles, but it still left me wanting. Maybe it's just my exposure to final fight scenes like Jet Li's ten minute brutal battle at the end of "Fist of Legend," but I want to see the hero struggle and fight to the bitter end to win.
Overall, damn solid movie that works really well as a sequel to one of the best superhero movies ever made. And with the final ending surprise setup for the next Marvel movie...well, as far as comic book superhero movies go, Make Mine Marvel.
K
Here's some Iron Man extra goodies for all our loyal 'clubbers out there.
Build Your Own Arc Reactor
A Look At the Iron Man Suits from the Films
A Free Iron Man PDF Comic from Diesel
Great review, Kurt!
ReplyDeleteA lot of great points, I definitely agree with you about that last fight. I half expected/wanted to see Whiplash get back up and fight after that explosion. Seems like there were a lot of scenes that were cut for time. But overall, a great movie.
Yeah with the rumors of re-shoots and all that, I wonder what the original cut was like. There's def a few scenes in the trailer that are different in the movie. I hate when that happens, cause usually it's a great memorable moment.
ReplyDeleteI saw it this past weekend and thought it was a lot of fun. Black Widow was kind of a waste, and I didn't think that Rockwell and Rooney were underused...they were both strong personalities for the time they were on screen, any more would have just soured their performances. If anything I think Rockwell could have used a little less time, and more substance.
ReplyDeleteFury was silly. I didn't buy him an the ultimate bad-ass...which is something that Jackson can play. Leads me to believe that someone just needed to make rent this month.
1. First movie was a great drama/action film with elements of comedy. This movie was (trying) to be a comedy with elements of drama. Which makes sense that the 1st was written by the guy who wrote children of men and the 2nd was written by the guy who wrote tropic thunder.
ReplyDelete2. Isn't it more interesting that tony's self abuse and ego is killing him? Isn't it more interesting that tony's father was a thief and a butch and tony has to deal with that? Nope, let's pull the punches, unobtanium is killing him and howard was a swell guy... fuck that noise!
I hated this movie in all it's missed opportunities and failed jokes. I'm shocked no one was kicked in the nuts.
The worst part about this aside from the fact that I'm no longer excited about any other marvel movies? The fact that people are qualifying this thing. It's transformers all over again. "That movie blew." "Well it was a comic movie what do you want?" I want a good movie! No one said that about iron man or dark knight and that's what I want. When does Scott pilgrim come out? I hope to heel that How to train your dragon isn't the best flick I see all year!
- josh Jenkins
I think that the theme of Tony Stark being the real villain of these films is present. I never really cared for him, and a lot like Roadie, thought that he needed to be taken down. It would have been an excellent movie if it focused on that, instead we got Mickey Rourke stalking in from some Eastern European revenge film.
ReplyDeleteThe movie was enjoyable, though. Downey Jr. and Rockwell were really fun to watch in every scene...but they really did dance around any kind of serious theme presented.
Hopefully they're working with a three movie character arc, and in the third one Tony Stark will become an actual character I care about.
``I heard CNNs Talkback Live today is going to be discussing Michael. I told him that once while in high school agirl friend of mine and I put clothes pins on our nipples and ithurt so much I took them off immediately.
ReplyDeletefurry porn stories
free xxx beastiality sex stories
stories shemale interracial
free sex stories young
young lovers sex stories
``I heard CNNs Talkback Live today is going to be discussing Michael. I told him that once while in high school agirl friend of mine and I put clothes pins on our nipples and ithurt so much I took them off immediately.